CVE-2026-2075
📋 TL;DR
This CVE describes an improper access control vulnerability in yeqifu warehouse's role-permission binding handler. Attackers can remotely exploit this flaw to manipulate role permissions, potentially gaining unauthorized access to system functions. All deployments using affected versions are vulnerable until patched.
💻 Affected Systems
- yeqifu warehouse
⚠️ Manual Verification Required
This CVE does not have specific version information in our database, so automatic vulnerability detection cannot determine if your system is affected.
Why? The CVE database entry doesn't specify which versions are vulnerable (no version ranges provided by the vendor/NVD).
🔒 Custom verification scripts are available for registered users. Sign up free to download automated test scripts.
- Review the CVE details at NVD
- Check vendor security advisories for your specific version
- Test if the vulnerability is exploitable in your environment
- Consider updating to the latest version as a precaution
⚠️ Risk & Real-World Impact
Worst Case
Attackers could escalate privileges to administrative levels, modify all user permissions, and gain complete control over the warehouse system.
Likely Case
Attackers will modify role permissions to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data and administrative functions they shouldn't have.
If Mitigated
With proper network segmentation and least privilege principles, impact would be limited to the affected application component.
🎯 Exploit Status
The exploit has been released publicly and targets a specific function (saveRolePermission) with improper access controls.
🛠️ Fix & Mitigation
✅ Official Fix
Patch Version: Unknown - vendor has not responded
Vendor Advisory: None available
Restart Required: Yes
Instructions:
1. Monitor the GitHub repository for updates 2. Apply any security patches when released 3. Restart the application after patching
🔧 Temporary Workarounds
Network Access Restriction
linuxRestrict network access to the warehouse application to trusted IPs only
# Use firewall rules to restrict access
# Example: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport [APP_PORT] -s [TRUSTED_IP] -j ACCEPT
# iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport [APP_PORT] -j DROP
Application Firewall Rules
allImplement WAF rules to block suspicious role-permission modification requests
# Configure WAF to block requests to /sys/role/* with suspicious parameters
# Example ModSecurity rule: SecRule REQUEST_URI "@rx ^/sys/role/" "id:1001,phase:2,deny"
🧯 If You Can't Patch
- Implement strict network segmentation to isolate the warehouse application
- Enable detailed audit logging for all role-permission modification attempts and monitor for anomalies
🔍 How to Verify
Check if Vulnerable:
Check if your deployment uses code from commit aaf29962ba407d22d991781de28796ee7b4670e4 or earlier by examining git history or build artifactsCheck Version:
git log --oneline -1Verify Fix Applied:
Verify the fix by checking that the saveRolePermission function now implements proper authorization checks before allowing modifications📡 Detection & Monitoring
Log Indicators:
- Unauthorized role permission modification attempts
- Multiple failed authorization checks for saveRolePermission function
- Suspicious user activity from unexpected sources
Network Indicators:
- Unusual HTTP POST requests to /sys/role/* endpoints
- Requests attempting to modify permissions without proper authentication headers
SIEM Query:
source="warehouse_logs" AND (uri_path="/sys/role/*" AND http_method="POST") AND (user_role!="admin" OR auth_success="false")