CVE-2025-8773

7.3 HIGH

📋 TL;DR

This critical SQL injection vulnerability in Dinstar Monitoring Platform allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands by manipulating the userBean.loginName parameter. Remote attackers can potentially access, modify, or delete database contents. All users of Dinstar Monitoring Platform 甘肃省危险品库监控平台 1.0 are affected.

💻 Affected Systems

Products:
  • Dinstar Monitoring Platform 甘肃省危险品库监控平台
Versions: 1.0
Operating Systems: Unknown - likely Windows or Linux server environments
Default Config Vulnerable: ⚠️ Yes
Notes: The vulnerability exists in the default installation. No special configuration is required for exploitation.

📦 What is this software?

⚠️ Risk & Real-World Impact

🔴

Worst Case

Complete database compromise leading to data theft, data destruction, authentication bypass, and potential remote code execution via database functions.

🟠

Likely Case

Unauthorized data access, credential theft, and potential privilege escalation within the monitoring platform.

🟢

If Mitigated

Limited impact with proper input validation, parameterized queries, and network segmentation in place.

🌐 Internet-Facing: HIGH - The vulnerability is remotely exploitable and affects a monitoring platform that may be exposed to the internet.
🏢 Internal Only: MEDIUM - Even internally, this could allow lateral movement and privilege escalation within the network.

🎯 Exploit Status

Public PoC: ⚠️ Yes
Weaponized: LIKELY
Unauthenticated Exploit: ⚠️ Yes
Complexity: LOW

Exploit details are publicly available on GitHub, making this easily weaponizable by attackers with basic SQL injection knowledge.

🛠️ Fix & Mitigation

✅ Official Fix

Patch Version: Unknown

Vendor Advisory: None available - vendor did not respond to disclosure

Restart Required: No

Instructions:

No official patch available. Consider implementing workarounds or replacing the software.

🔧 Temporary Workarounds

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules

all

Implement WAF rules to block SQL injection patterns targeting the vulnerable endpoint

# Example WAF rule to block suspicious patterns in loginName parameter
# Block patterns containing SQL keywords: SELECT, UNION, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP, OR, AND

Network Access Control

linux

Restrict access to the vulnerable endpoint using network segmentation or firewall rules

# Example firewall rule to restrict access to /itc/* paths
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m string --string "/itc/" --algo bm -j DROP

🧯 If You Can't Patch

  • Isolate the monitoring platform in a separate network segment with strict access controls
  • Implement database-level protections: use least privilege database accounts, enable SQL injection prevention features

🔍 How to Verify

Check if Vulnerable:

Test the endpoint /itc/${appPath}/login_getPasswordErrorNum.action with SQL injection payloads in the userBean.loginName parameter

Check Version:

Check application version through web interface or configuration files - specific command unknown

Verify Fix Applied:

Verify that SQL injection attempts no longer succeed and that proper input validation is implemented

📡 Detection & Monitoring

Log Indicators:

  • Unusual SQL error messages in application logs
  • Multiple failed login attempts with SQL patterns in usernames
  • Requests to /itc/*/login_getPasswordErrorNum.action with suspicious parameters

Network Indicators:

  • HTTP requests containing SQL keywords in URL parameters
  • Unusual database query patterns from application server

SIEM Query:

source="web_logs" AND (url="*login_getPasswordErrorNum.action*" AND (param="*SELECT*" OR param="*UNION*" OR param="*OR*"))

🔗 References

📤 Share & Export