CVE-2025-57247

9.1 CRITICAL

📋 TL;DR

The BATBToken smart contract contains critical access control vulnerabilities in whitelist management functions. Any user can bypass transfer restrictions and manipulate special address settings, allowing unauthorized privilege escalation and disruption of tokenomics mechanisms. All users interacting with this smart contract are affected.

💻 Affected Systems

Products:
  • BATBToken smart contract
Versions: All versions using the vulnerable contract at address 0xfbf1388408670c02f0dbbb74251d8ded1d63b7a2
Operating Systems: Not applicable - smart contract vulnerability
Default Config Vulnerable: ⚠️ Yes
Notes: The vulnerability exists in the deployed contract code and affects all interactions with this specific contract address.

⚠️ Manual Verification Required

This CVE does not have specific version information in our database, so automatic vulnerability detection cannot determine if your system is affected.

Why? The CVE database entry doesn't specify which versions are vulnerable (no version ranges provided by the vendor/NVD).

🔒 Custom verification scripts are available for registered users. Sign up free to download automated test scripts.

Recommended Actions:
  1. Review the CVE details at NVD
  2. Check vendor security advisories for your specific version
  3. Test if the vulnerability is exploitable in your environment
  4. Consider updating to the latest version as a precaution

⚠️ Risk & Real-World Impact

🔴

Worst Case

Complete compromise of tokenomics: attackers can disable all transfer restrictions, manipulate dividend distributions, and potentially drain funds by adding themselves to whitelists.

🟠

Likely Case

Unauthorized users bypass cold time transfer restrictions, enabling premature token transfers and disrupting the intended token distribution schedule.

🟢

If Mitigated

Proper access control would restrict these functions to contract owner only, maintaining intended tokenomics and preventing unauthorized modifications.

🌐 Internet-Facing: HIGH - Smart contracts are inherently internet-facing and accessible to anyone on the blockchain network.
🏢 Internal Only: LOW - This is a public smart contract with no internal-only components.

🎯 Exploit Status

Public PoC: ⚠️ Yes
Weaponized: LIKELY
Unauthenticated Exploit: ⚠️ Yes
Complexity: LOW

Exploitation requires only calling the vulnerable functions with appropriate parameters, which can be done via any Ethereum/BSC wallet or interaction tool.

🛠️ Fix & Mitigation

✅ Official Fix

Patch Version: Not applicable - smart contracts are immutable once deployed

Vendor Advisory: https://github.com/RikkaLzw/CVE/blob/main/CVE_BATB-TOKEN.md

Restart Required: No

Instructions:

1. Deploy a new, fixed version of the smart contract with proper access control modifiers. 2. Migrate all token holders to the new contract. 3. Announce the migration to all users. 4. Consider the old contract deprecated and warn users against using it.

🔧 Temporary Workarounds

Contract monitoring and alerting

all

Monitor the vulnerable contract for suspicious calls to setColdWhiteList() and setSpecialAddress() functions

Use blockchain explorers or monitoring tools to track contract interactions

🧯 If You Can't Patch

  • Warn all users to stop interacting with the vulnerable contract address immediately
  • Implement off-chain validation to reject transactions involving the vulnerable contract

🔍 How to Verify

Check if Vulnerable:

Inspect the contract code at the given address and verify that setColdWhiteList() and setSpecialAddress() functions lack access control modifiers like onlyOwner

Check Version:

Not applicable - check contract address instead: 0xfbf1388408670c02f0dbbb74251d8ded1d63b7a2

Verify Fix Applied:

Check that a new contract has been deployed with proper access control and that the old contract is no longer in active use

📡 Detection & Monitoring

Log Indicators:

  • Unusual calls to setColdWhiteList() or setSpecialAddress() from non-owner addresses
  • Multiple whitelist modifications in short timeframes

Network Indicators:

  • Increased transaction volume to the vulnerable contract
  • Unusual patterns in contract function calls

SIEM Query:

Not applicable - use blockchain monitoring tools instead of traditional SIEM

🔗 References

📤 Share & Export