CVE-2025-11022

9.6 CRITICAL

📋 TL;DR

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Personal Project Panilux allows attackers to trick authenticated users into executing unintended actions. When exploited, this CSRF vulnerability can lead to command injection, potentially giving attackers remote code execution capabilities. This affects Panilux versions before v0.10.0, though the vendor denies ownership of the product.

💻 Affected Systems

Products:
  • Personal Project Panilux
Versions: All versions before v0.10.0
Operating Systems: All platforms running Panilux
Default Config Vulnerable: ⚠️ Yes
Notes: Vendor denies ownership of the product, suggesting it may be abandoned or unofficial software. The vulnerability requires the application to be accessible to attackers and have authenticated users.

⚠️ Manual Verification Required

This CVE does not have specific version information in our database, so automatic vulnerability detection cannot determine if your system is affected.

Why? The CVE database entry doesn't specify which versions are vulnerable (no version ranges provided by the vendor/NVD).

🔒 Custom verification scripts are available for registered users. Sign up free to download automated test scripts.

Recommended Actions:
  1. Review the CVE details at NVD
  2. Check vendor security advisories for your specific version
  3. Test if the vulnerability is exploitable in your environment
  4. Consider updating to the latest version as a precaution

⚠️ Risk & Real-World Impact

🔴

Worst Case

Remote code execution with full system compromise, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the server with the privileges of the Panilux application.

🟠

Likely Case

Unauthorized actions performed on behalf of authenticated users, potentially including configuration changes, data manipulation, or limited command execution depending on application functionality.

🟢

If Mitigated

Limited impact with proper CSRF protections and input validation in place, potentially reduced to minor configuration changes.

🌐 Internet-Facing: HIGH
🏢 Internal Only: MEDIUM

🎯 Exploit Status

Public PoC: ✅ No
Weaponized: UNKNOWN
Unauthenticated Exploit: ✅ No
Complexity: LOW

Exploitation requires tricking an authenticated user into visiting a malicious page while logged into Panilux. The CSRF leads to command injection, suggesting the application processes user input unsafely.

🛠️ Fix & Mitigation

✅ Official Fix

Patch Version: v0.10.0 or later

Vendor Advisory: None (vendor denies ownership)

Restart Required: Yes

Instructions:

1. Upgrade Panilux to version 0.10.0 or later. 2. Verify the installation. 3. Restart the Panilux service. 4. Test functionality.

🔧 Temporary Workarounds

Implement CSRF Tokens

all

Add anti-CSRF tokens to all state-changing requests in Panilux

Implementation depends on Panilux's framework; typically involves adding unique tokens to forms and validating them server-side

Input Validation and Sanitization

all

Implement strict input validation and command sanitization to prevent command injection

Sanitize all user inputs, especially those used in system commands; use allowlists for expected values

🧯 If You Can't Patch

  • Isolate Panilux behind a firewall with strict access controls, limiting exposure to trusted users only
  • Implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block CSRF attempts and command injection patterns

🔍 How to Verify

Check if Vulnerable:

Check Panilux version; if below 0.10.0, it is vulnerable. Review application logs for unexpected command execution or CSRF attempts.

Check Version:

Check Panilux configuration files or admin interface for version information; command varies by installation method.

Verify Fix Applied:

After upgrading to v0.10.0 or later, test CSRF protection by attempting to submit requests without valid tokens and verify command injection is prevented.

📡 Detection & Monitoring

Log Indicators:

  • Unexpected command execution in system logs
  • Failed CSRF token validation attempts in application logs
  • Unusual POST requests from unexpected sources

Network Indicators:

  • HTTP requests with suspicious parameters that could trigger command execution
  • Traffic patterns indicating CSRF attacks (e.g., requests from external sites to Panilux endpoints)

SIEM Query:

Example: search for 'Panilux' AND ('command' OR 'exec' OR 'system') in application logs, or detect POST requests without Referer headers matching the application domain.

🔗 References

📤 Share & Export