CVE-2018-25099

9.8 CRITICAL

📋 TL;DR

This vulnerability in the CryptX Perl module allows attackers to bypass authentication and integrity checks in cryptographic operations. It affects applications using CryptX for GCM or ChaCha20-Poly1305 decryption without proper tag verification, potentially leading to data manipulation or exposure. Systems running Perl applications with CryptX before version 0.062 are vulnerable.

💻 Affected Systems

Products:
  • CryptX Perl module
Versions: All versions before 0.062
Operating Systems: All operating systems running Perl with CryptX
Default Config Vulnerable: ⚠️ Yes
Notes: Only applications using gcm_decrypt_verify() or chacha20poly1305_decrypt_verify() functions are affected. Other CryptX functions remain secure.

⚠️ Manual Verification Required

This CVE does not have specific version information in our database, so automatic vulnerability detection cannot determine if your system is affected.

Why? The CVE database entry doesn't specify which versions are vulnerable (no version ranges provided by the vendor/NVD).

🔒 Custom verification scripts are available for registered users. Sign up free to download automated test scripts.

Recommended Actions:
  1. Review the CVE details at NVD
  2. Check vendor security advisories for your specific version
  3. Test if the vulnerability is exploitable in your environment
  4. Consider updating to the latest version as a precaution

⚠️ Risk & Real-World Impact

🔴

Worst Case

Complete compromise of encrypted data integrity, allowing attackers to forge authenticated messages, decrypt sensitive information, or inject malicious data into secure communications.

🟠

Likely Case

Data integrity violations where attackers can manipulate encrypted payloads without detection, potentially leading to privilege escalation or data corruption in affected applications.

🟢

If Mitigated

Limited impact with proper application-level validation and defense-in-depth controls, though cryptographic guarantees remain compromised.

🌐 Internet-Facing: HIGH - Applications exposed to the internet using vulnerable CryptX functions for authentication or data protection are at significant risk.
🏢 Internal Only: MEDIUM - Internal systems using vulnerable CryptX functions for sensitive operations remain vulnerable to insider threats or lateral movement.

🎯 Exploit Status

Public PoC: ⚠️ Yes
Weaponized: LIKELY
Unauthenticated Exploit: ⚠️ Yes
Complexity: LOW

Exploitation requires the attacker to have access to encrypted data and knowledge of the cryptographic implementation. The vulnerability is in the verification logic, making exploitation straightforward once the attack vector is identified.

🛠️ Fix & Mitigation

✅ Official Fix

Patch Version: 0.062 and later

Vendor Advisory: https://metacpan.org/dist/CryptX/changes

Restart Required: No

Instructions:

1. Update CryptX module using CPAN: 'cpan CryptX'
2. Verify installation: 'perl -MCryptX -e "print $CryptX::VERSION"'
3. Ensure version is 0.062 or higher
4. Restart any Perl applications using CryptX

🔧 Temporary Workarounds

Disable vulnerable functions

all

Replace calls to gcm_decrypt_verify() and chacha20poly1305_decrypt_verify() with alternative secure implementations or manual tag verification

Implement manual tag verification

all

Add explicit tag verification after decryption using separate verification functions

🧯 If You Can't Patch

  • Implement application-level integrity checks and validation of decrypted data
  • Isolate systems using vulnerable CryptX functions and monitor for anomalous behavior

🔍 How to Verify

Check if Vulnerable:

Check CryptX version: 'perl -MCryptX -e "print $CryptX::VERSION"' - if version is less than 0.062, system is vulnerable

Check Version:

perl -MCryptX -e "print $CryptX::VERSION"

Verify Fix Applied:

After update, verify version is 0.062 or higher and test decryption functions with invalid tags to ensure they properly reject unverified data

📡 Detection & Monitoring

Log Indicators:

  • Failed decryption attempts with invalid tags being accepted
  • Unexpected successful authentication from invalid credentials when using affected functions

Network Indicators:

  • Unusual patterns in encrypted traffic where integrity checks should fail but don't
  • Successful authentication/decryption with manipulated cryptographic tags

SIEM Query:

Search for application logs containing successful decryption/authentication events that should have failed based on cryptographic principles

🔗 References

📤 Share & Export