CVE-2014-5381

9.8 CRITICAL

📋 TL;DR

The Grand MA 300 fingerprint reader allows brute-force attacks on its PIN authentication due to weak verification mechanisms. This vulnerability enables attackers to bypass biometric security and gain unauthorized access to protected systems or areas. Organizations using Grand MA 300 devices for physical or logical access control are affected.

💻 Affected Systems

Products:
  • Grand MA 300 Fingerprint Reader
Versions: All versions prior to any security patch
Operating Systems: Embedded firmware
Default Config Vulnerable: ⚠️ Yes
Notes: The vulnerability exists in the PIN verification mechanism of the device firmware. All devices using default or weak PIN configurations are vulnerable.

📦 What is this software?

⚠️ Risk & Real-World Impact

🔴

Worst Case

Complete compromise of physical security systems, unauthorized access to secure facilities, theft of sensitive assets, or bypass of multi-factor authentication systems.

🟠

Likely Case

Unauthorized individuals gain access to restricted areas or systems protected by the fingerprint reader, potentially leading to theft, espionage, or sabotage.

🟢

If Mitigated

Limited impact with proper network segmentation, additional security layers, and monitoring in place to detect brute-force attempts.

🌐 Internet-Facing: LOW (These are typically physical access control devices not directly internet-facing)
🏢 Internal Only: HIGH (Devices are deployed in internal networks for access control and can be targeted by internal threats or compromised systems)

🎯 Exploit Status

Public PoC: ⚠️ Yes
Weaponized: LIKELY
Unauthenticated Exploit: ⚠️ Yes
Complexity: LOW

Simple brute-force attack tools can be used against the PIN authentication. The vulnerability is well-documented with public proof-of-concept information available.

🛠️ Fix & Mitigation

✅ Official Fix

Patch Version: Unknown

Vendor Advisory: No official vendor advisory found

Restart Required: No

Instructions:

No official patch available. Contact manufacturer for firmware updates or replacement options.

🔧 Temporary Workarounds

Implement Strong PIN Policies

all

Enforce complex, long PINs that are resistant to brute-force attacks

Network Segmentation

all

Isolate fingerprint readers on separate network segments with strict access controls

Rate Limiting

all

Implement network-level rate limiting for authentication attempts

🧯 If You Can't Patch

  • Replace vulnerable devices with newer models that have proper security controls
  • Implement additional physical security measures as compensating controls

🔍 How to Verify

Check if Vulnerable:

Check device model and firmware version. Test if PIN can be brute-forced using automated tools (with proper authorization).

Check Version:

Check device display or management interface for firmware version information

Verify Fix Applied:

Verify that strong PIN policies are enforced and test resistance to brute-force attacks.

📡 Detection & Monitoring

Log Indicators:

  • Multiple failed authentication attempts from single source
  • Unusual authentication patterns
  • Successful authentication after many failures

Network Indicators:

  • High volume of authentication requests to device IP
  • Traffic patterns consistent with brute-force tools

SIEM Query:

source_ip="[device_ip]" AND (event_type="authentication_failure" OR event_type="authentication") | stats count by source_ip, user | where count > threshold

🔗 References

📤 Share & Export